Paper detail

Pulsating hydrogen-deficient white dwarfs and pre-white dwarfs observed with TESS: I. Asteroseismology of the GW Vir stars RX J2117+3412, HS 2324+3944, NGC 6905, NGC 1501, NGC 2371, and K 1-16

In this paper, we present a detailed asteroseismological analysis of six GW Vir stars including the observations collected by the TESS mission. We processed and analyzed TESS observations of RX J2117+3412, HS 2324+3944, NGC 6905, NGC 1501, NGC 2371, and K 1-16. We carried out a detailed asteroseismological analysis of these stars on the basis of PG 1159 evolutionary models that take into account the complete evolution of the progenitor stars. In total, we extracted 58 periodicities from the TESS light curves using a standard pre-whitening procedure to derive the potential pulsation frequencies. All the oscillation frequencies that we found are associated with g-mode pulsations with periods spanning from $\sim 817$ s to $\sim 2682$ s. We find constant period spacings for all but one star, which allowed us to infer their stellar masses and constrain the harmonic degree $\ell$ of the modes. We performed period-to-period fit analyses on five of the six analyzed stars. For four stars, we were able to find an asteroseismological model with masses in agreement with the stellar-mass values inferred from the period spacings, and generally compatible with the spectroscopic masses. We estimated the seismological distance and compared it with the precise astrometric distance measured with GAIA. Finally, we find that the period spectrum of K 1-16 exhibits dramatic changes in frequency and amplitude. The high-quality data collected by the TESS space mission, considered simultaneously with ground-based observations, are able to provide a very valuable input to the asteroseismology of GW Vir stars, similar to the case of other classes of pulsating white-dwarf stars. The TESS mission, in conjunction with future space missions and upcoming surveys, will make impressive progress in white-dwarf asteroseismology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.