Paper detail

Pulsatile Viscous Flows in Elliptical Vessels and Annuli: Solution to the Inverse Problem, with Application to Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow

We consider the fully-developed flow of an incompressible Newtonian fluid in a cylindrical vessel with elliptical cross-section (both an ellipse and the annulus between two confocal ellipses). In particular, we address an inverse problem, namely to compute the velocity field associated with a given, time-periodic flow rate. This is motivated by the fact that flow rate is the main physical quantity which can be actually measured in many practical situations. We propose a novel numerical strategy, which is nonetheless grounded on several analytical relations. The proposed method leads to the solution of some simple ordinary differential systems. It holds promise to be more amenable to implementation than previous approaches, which are substantially based on the challenging computation of Mathieu functions. Some numerical results are reported, based on measured data for human blood flow in the internal carotid artery, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in the upper cervical region of the human spine. As expected, computational efficiency is the main asset of our solution: a speed-up factor over 10^3 was obtained, compared to more elaborate numerical approaches. The main goal of the present study is to provide an improved source of initial/boundary data for more ambitious numerical approaches, as well as a benchmark solution for pulsatile flows in elliptical sections with given flow rate. The proposed method can be effectively applied to bio-fluid dynamics investigations (possibly addressing key aspects of relevant diseases), to biomedical applications (including targeted drug delivery and energy harvesting for implantable devices), up to longer-term medical microrobotics applications.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.