Paper detail

PULSARS WITH STRONG MAGNETIC FIELDS: POLAR GAPS, BOUND PAIR CREATION AND NONTHERMAL LUMINOSITIES

Modifications to polar-gap models for pulsars are discussed for the case where the surface magnetic field, $B_§$, of the neutron star is strong. For $B\ga4\times10^8\rm\,T$, the curvature $γ$-quanta emitted tangentially to the curved force lines of the magnetic field are captured near the threshold of bound pair creation and are channelled along the magnetic field as bound electron-positron pairs (positronium). The stability of such bound pairs against ionization by the parallel electric field, $E_\parallel$, in the polar cap, and against photoionization is discussed. Unlike free pairs, bound pairs do not screen $E_\parallel$ near the neutron star. As a consequence, the energy flux in highly relativistic particles and high-frequency (X-ray and/or $γ$-ray) radiation from the polar gaps can be much greater than in the absence of positronium formation. We discuss this enhancement for (a) Arons-type models, in which particles flow freely from the surface, and find any enhancement to be modest, and (b) Ruderman-Sutherland-type models, in which particles are tightly bound to the surface, and find that the enhancement can be substantial. In the latter case we argue for a self-consistent, time-independent model in which partial screening of $E_\parallel$ maintains it close to the threshold value for field ionization of the bound pairs, and in which a reverse flux of accelerated particles maintains the polar cap at a temperature such that thermionic emission supplies the particles needed for this screening. This model applies only in a restricted range of periods, $P_2<P<P_1$, and it implies an energy flux in high-energy particles that can correspond to a substantial fraction of the spin-down power of the pulsar. Nonthermal, high-frequency radiation has been observed from six radio pulsars

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.