Paper detail

Pulsar timing constraints on narrow-band stochastic signals

We consider the sensitivity of the pulsar timing array (PTA) technique to specific kind of narrow-band stochastic signals in nano-Hz frequency range. Specifically, we examine the narrow-band signal produced by oscillating gravitational scalar potentials in the Galaxy (Gravitational Potential Background), which arise if an ultralight massive scalar field is the galactic dark matter. We have performed a Bayesian analysis of publicly available data on 12 pulsars obtained by the NANOGrav project. In the monochromatic approximation, the upper limit on the variable gravitational potential amplitude is $Ψ_c<1.14 \times 10^{-15}$, corresponding to the dimensionless strain amplitude $h_c=2\sqrt{3}Ψ_c < 4\times 10^{-15}$ at frequency $f=1.75\times 10^{-8} Hz$. In the narrow-band approximation, the upper limit on the energy density of GPB is found to be $Ω_{GPB}<1.27 \times 10^{-9}$ at $f=6.2\times 10^{-9} Hz$. These limits are an order of magnitude higher than the theoretically expected values, if the ultralight scalar field with a mass of $\sim 10^{-23} eV$ is assumed to be the galactic dark matter with a local density of $\sim 0.3 GeV cm^{-3}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.