Paper detail

Pudding-mold type band in a potential thermoelectric material CuAlO$_2$ : comparison with Na$_x$CoO$_2$

A potential thermoelectric material CuAlO$_2$ is theoretically studied. We first construct a model Hamiltonian of CuAlO$_2$ based on the first principles band calculation, and calculate the Seebeck coefficient. Then, we compare the model with that of a well-known thermoelectric material Na$_x$CoO$_2$, and discuss the similarities and the differences. It is found that the two materials are similar from an electronic structure viewpoint in that they have a peculiar pudding-mold type band shape, which is advantageous as thermoelectric materials. There are however some differences, and we analyze the origin of the difference from a microscopic viewpoint. The band shape of CuAlO$_2$ is found to be even more ideal than that of Na$_x$CoO$_2$, and we predict that once a significant amount of holes is doped in CuAlO$_2$, thermoelectric properties (especially the power factor) even better than that of Na$_x$CoO$_2$ can be expected.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.