Paper detail

Psychophysical Evaluation of Deep Re-Identification Models

Pedestrian re-identification (ReID) is the task of continuously recognising the sameindividual across time and camera views. Researchers of pedestrian ReID and theirGPUs spend enormous energy producing novel algorithms, challenging datasets,and readily accessible tools to successfully improve results on standard metrics.Yet practitioners in biometrics, surveillance, and autonomous driving have not re-alized benefits that reflect these metrics. Different detections, slight occlusions,changes in perspective, and other banal perturbations render the best neural net-works virtually useless. This work makes two contributions. First, we introducethe ReID community to a budding area of computer vision research in model eval-uation. By adapting established principles of psychophysical evaluation from psy-chology, we can quantify the performance degradation and begin research thatwill improve the utility of pedestrian ReID models; not just their performance ontest sets. Second, we introduce NuscenesReID, a challenging new ReID datasetdesigned to reflect the real world autonomous vehicle conditions in which ReIDalgorithms are used. We show that, despite performing well on existing ReIDdatasets, most models are not robust to synthetic augmentations or to the morerealistic NuscenesReID data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.