Paper detail

Pseudoscalar top-Higgs coupling: Exploration of $\mathrm{CP}$-odd observables to resolve the sign ambiguity

We present a collection of $\mathrm{CP}$-odd observables for the process $pp\to t\,\left(\rightarrow b {\ell}^+ ν_{\ell}\right) \bar{t}\,\left(\rightarrow \bar{b} {\ell}^-{\barν}_{\ell}\right)\,H$ that are linearly dependent on the scalar ($κ_t$) and pseudoscalar ($\tildeκ_t$) top-Higgs coupling and hence sensitive to the corresponding relative sign. The proposed observables are based on triple product (TP) correlations that we extract from the expression for the differential cross section in terms of the spin vectors of the top and antitop quarks. In order to explore other possibilities, we progressively modify these TPs, first by combining them, and then by replacing the spin vectors by the lepton momenta or the $t$ and $\bar{t}$ momenta by their visible parts. We generate Monte Carlo data sets for several benchmark scenarios, including the Standard Model ($κ_t=1$, $\tildeκ_t=0$) and two scenarios with mixed $\mathrm{CP}$ properties ($κ_t=1$, $\tildeκ_t=\pm 1$). Assuming an integrated luminosity that is consistent with that envisioned for the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider, using Monte Carlo-truth and taking into account only statistical uncertainties, we find that the most promising observable can disentangle the "$\mathrm{CP}$-mixed" scenarios with an effective separation of $\sim 19σ$. In the case of observables that do not require the reconstruction of the $t$ and $\bar{t}$ momenta, the power of discrimination is up to $\sim 13σ$ for the same number of events. We also show that the most promising observables can still disentangle the $\mathrm{CP}$-mixed scenarios when the number of events is reduced to values consistent with expectations for the Large Hadron Collider in the near term.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.