Paper detail

Pseudorandom Generators for Polynomial Threshold Functions

We study the natural question of constructing pseudorandom generators (PRGs) for low-degree polynomial threshold functions (PTFs). We give a PRG with seed-length log n/eps^{O(d)} fooling degree d PTFs with error at most eps. Previously, no nontrivial constructions were known even for quadratic threshold functions and constant error eps. For the class of degree 1 threshold functions or halfspaces, we construct PRGs with much better dependence on the error parameter eps and obtain a PRG with seed-length O(log n + log^2(1/eps)). Previously, only PRGs with seed length O(log n log^2(1/eps)/eps^2) were known for halfspaces. We also obtain PRGs with similar seed lengths for fooling halfspaces over the n-dimensional unit sphere. The main theme of our constructions and analysis is the use of invariance principles to construct pseudorandom generators. We also introduce the notion of monotone read-once branching programs, which is key to improving the dependence on the error rate eps for halfspaces. These techniques may be of independent interest.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.