Paper detail

Pseudoinvariance and the extra degree of freedom in f(T) gravity

Nonlinear generalizations of teleparallel gravity entail the modification of a Lagrangian that is pseudoinvariant under local Lorentz transformations of the tetrad field. This procedure consequently leads to the loss of the local pseudoinvariance and the appearance of additional degrees of freedom (d.o.f.). The constraint structure of f(T) gravity suggests the existence of one extra d.o.f. when compared with GR, which should describe some aspect of the orientation of the tetrad. The purpose of this article is to better understand the nature of this extra d.o.f. by means of a toy model that mimics essential features of f(T) gravity. We find that the nonlinear modification of a Lagrangian L possessing a local rotational pseudoinvariance produces two types of solutions. In one case the original gauge-invariant variables -- the analogue of the metric in teleparallelism -- evolve like when governed by the (nondeformed) Lagrangian L; these solutions are characterized by a (selectable) constant value of its Lagrangian, which is the manifestation of the extra d.o.f. In the other case, the solutions do contain new dynamics for the original gauge-invariant variables, but the extra d.o.f. does not materialize because the Lagrangian remains invariant on-shell. Coming back to f(T) gravity, the first case includes solutions where the torsion scalar T is a constant, to be chosen at the initial conditions (extra d.o.f.), and no new dynamics for the metric is expected. The latter case covers those solutions displaying a genuine modified gravity; T is not a constant, but it is (on-shell) invariant under Lorentz transformations depending only on time. Both kinds of f(T) solutions are exemplified in a flat FLRW universe. Finally, we present a toy model for a higher-order Lagrangian with rotational invariance [analogous to f(R) gravity] and derive its constraint structure and number of d.o.f.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.