Paper detail

PSACCF: Prioritized Online Slice Admission Control Considering Fairness in 5G/B5G Networks

5G/B5G is envisioned to support various services with the assistance of network slices, each slice instance asks for adequate resources to provide the pre-negotiated service quality to its subscribers. Slice Admission Control (SAC) algorithm is a necessity for Slice Providers (SPs) to guarantee the QoS and QoE of each admitted request with limited resources. In that circumstance, the priority concern of services and the fairness of resource allocation arise as meaningful topics for researchers. The former originates from the innate characteristics of various services supported by 5G networks, and the latter matters because slices are instantiated on shared physical equipment. However, the two issues are mainly investigated separately in the literature or do not receive sufficient research simultaneously. In this work, we study the SAC problem in 5G/B5G networks, aiming at enhancing the fairness degree on the premise of satisfying the necessary priority requirements. We first reinterpret priority as a higher cumulative service acceptance ratio (CSAR), and adopt the uniformity of adjacent CSAR gaps to reflect the fairness. Based on these adjustments, the SAC problem is formulated as a non-linear and non-convex multi-objective optimization. Thus, we propose a heuristic algorithm called Prioritized Slice Admission Control Considering Fairness (PSACCF) to solve it. It introduces the resource efficiency of services to amend priority violations, then promotes fairness by setting the target CSARs for each service type and pushing their actual CSARs toward. Numerous simulations are carried out to compare the performance of PSACCF with two existing algorithms, termed MHPF and AHPF. Results show that our algorithm can achieve a nearly identical priority indicator to the comparisons, as well as at least a 33.6% improvement in fairness degree and a higher minimum average resource utilization.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.