Paper detail

Proximity-induced zero-energy states indistinguishable from topological edge states

When normal metals (NMs) are attached to topological insulators or topological superconductors, it is conceivable that the quantum states in these finite adjacent materials can intermix. In this case -- and because the NM usually does not possess the same symmetry as the topological material -- it is pertinent to ask whether zero-energy edge states in the topological layer are affected by the presence of the NM. To address this issue, we consider three prototype systems simulated by tight-binding models, namely a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger/NM, a Kitaev/NM, and a Chern insulator/NM. For all junctions investigated, we find that there exist trivial ``fine-tuned'' zero-energy states in the NM layer that can percolate into the topological region, thus mimicking a topological state. These zero-energy states are created by fine-tuning the NM chemical potential such that some of the NM states cross zero energy; they can occur even when the topological material is in the topologically trivial phase, and exist over a large region of the topological phase diagram. Interestingly, the true Majorana end modes of the Kitaev/NM model cannot be crossed by any NM state, as the NM metal layer in this case does not break particle-hole symmetry. On the other hand, when the chiral symmetry of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain is broken by the attached NM, crossings are allowed. In addition, even in Chern insulators that do not preserve nonspatial symmetries, but the topological edge state self-generates a symmetry eigenvalue, such a fine-tuned zero-energy state can still occur. Our results indicate that when a topological material is attached to a metallic layer, one has to be cautious as to identify true topological edge states merely from their energy spectra and wave function profiles near the interface.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.