Paper detail

Proving the uncountability of the number of irrational powers of irrational numbers evaluated as rationals and solutions approximation for x^x=y and x^{x^x}=y

Numbers are often used to define more complicated numbers. For example, two integers are used to define a rational number and two reals are used to define a complex number. It might be expected that an irrational power of an irrational number would be an irrational number. Despite that, it is actually possible for an irrational power of an irrational number to be a rational number. For many generations, this circulated as a non-constructive proof by contradiction in logic for discrete mathematics textbooks and college courses. Since the 80s, a constructive proof circulated orally, such as $\sqrt{2}^{log_\sqrt{2} 3}$ equals to 3. A written proof was published in 2008 by Lord. The first contribution of this paper is to prove that there is an uncountable number of such pairs of irrational numbers such that the power of one to the other is a rational number. Marshall and Tan answered the question of whether there is a single irrational number $a$ such that $a^a$ is rational. They proved that given $I$ = $(\frac{1}{e})^{(\frac{1}{e},\infty)}$, then every rational number in $I$ is either of the form $a^a$ for an irrational $a$ or is in the very thin set $\{1,4,27,256,...,n^n,...\}$. It seems a challenging task to analytically solve the equation $x^x=y$ for any real $y$. To the best of our knowledge, there is no work on finding $x$ from a given $y$. We proved that $ln((ln(y))<x$ for $y>e$ and $x<ln(y)$, for $y> e^e$. Hence, the second contribution of this paper is to estimate the real $x$ such that either one of the equations $x^x=y$ or $x^{x^x}=y$ holds, for a given $y$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.