Paper detail

Provably Positive High-Order Schemes for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics: Analysis on General Meshes

This paper proposes and analyzes arbitrarily high-order discontinuous Galerkin (DG) and finite volume methods which provably preserve the positivity of density and pressure for the ideal MHD on general meshes. Unified auxiliary theories are built for rigorously analyzing the positivity-preserving (PP) property of MHD schemes with a HLL type flux on polytopal meshes in any space dimension. The main challenges overcome here include establishing relation between the PP property and discrete divergence of magnetic field on general meshes, and estimating proper wave speeds in the HLL flux to ensure the PP property. In 1D case, we prove that the standard DG and finite volume methods with the proposed HLL flux are PP, under condition accessible by a PP limiter. For multidimensional conservative MHD system, standard DG methods with a PP limiter are not PP in general, due to the effect of unavoidable divergence-error. We construct provably PP high-order DG and finite volume schemes by proper discretization of symmetrizable MHD system, with two divergence-controlling techniques: locally divergence-free elements and a penalty term. The former leads to zero divergence within each cell, while the latter controls the divergence error across cell interfaces. Our analysis reveals that a coupling of them is important for positivity preservation, as they exactly contribute the discrete divergence-terms absent in standard DG schemes but crucial for ensuring the PP property. Numerical tests confirm the PP property and the effectiveness of proposed PP schemes. Unlike conservative MHD system, the exact smooth solutions of symmetrizable MHD system are proved to retain the positivity even if the divergence-free condition is not satisfied. Our analysis and findings further the understanding, at both discrete and continuous levels, of the relation between the PP property and the divergence-free constraint.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.