Paper detail

Protostellar disk formation by a non-rotating, non-axisymmetric collapsing cloud: model and comparison with observations

Planet-forming disks are fundamental objects thought to be inherited from large scale rotation, through the conservation of angular momentum during the collapse of a prestellar dense core. We investigate the possibility for a protostellar disk to be formed from a motionless dense core which contains non-axisymmetric density fluctuations. The rotation is thus generated locally by the asymmetry of the collapse. We study the evolution of the angular momentum in a non-axisymmetric collapse of a dense core from an analytical point of view. To test the theory, we perform three-dimensional simulations of a collapsing prestellar dense core using adaptative mesh refinement. We start from a non-axisymmetrical situation, considering a dense core with random density perturbations that follow a turbulence spectrum. We analyse the emerging disk comparing the angular momentum it contains with the one expected from our analytic development. We study the velocity gradients at different scales in the simulation as it is done with observations. We show that the angular momentum in the frame of a stellar object which is not located at the center of mass of the core is not conserved, due to inertial forces. Our simulations of such non-axisymmetrical collapse quickly produce accretion disks at the small scales in the core. The analysis of the kinematics at different scales in the simulated core reveals projected velocity gradients of amplitudes similar to the ones observed in protostellar cores, and which directions vary, sometimes even reversing when small and large scales are compared. These complex kinematics patterns appear in recent observations, and could be a discriminating feature with models where rotation is inherited from large scales. Our results from simulations without initial rotation are more consistent with these recent observations than when solid-body rotation is initially [abridged]

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.