Paper detail

Protostellar accretion in low mass metal poor stars and the cosmological lithium problem

The cosmological lithium problem, that is, the discrepancy between the lithium abundance predicted by the Big Bang nucleosynthesis and the one observed for the stars of the 'Spite plateau', is one of the long standing problems of modern astrophysics. Recent hints for a possible solution involve lithium burning induced by protostellar mass accretion on Spite plateau stars. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of protostellar accretion on low metallicity low-mass stars with a focus on PMS lithium evolution. We computed the evolution from the protostar to the MS phase of accreting models with final masses of 0.7 and 0.8 M$_\odot$, and three metallicities Z=0.0001, Z=0.0010, and Z=0.0050. The effects of changing the main parameters affecting accreting models, that is the accretion energy (cold versus hot accretion), the initial seed mass $M_{seed}$ and radius $R_{seed}$, and the mass accretion rate $\dot{m}$, have been investigated in detail. As for the main stellar properties and the surface $^7 Li$ abundance, hot accretion models converge to standard non-accreting ones within 1 Myr, regardless of the actual value of $M_{seed}$, $R_{seed}$, and $\dot{m}$. Also, cold accretion models with a relatively large $M_{seed}$ ($\gtrsim 10~M_{jup}$) or $R_{seed}$ ($\gtrsim 1~R_\odot$) converge to standard non-accreting ones in less than about 10-20~Myr. A drastically different evolution occurs whenever a cold protostellar accretion process starts from small values of $M_{seed}$ and $R_{seed}$ ($M_{seed}\sim 1~M_{jup}$, $R_{seed} \lesssim 1~R_\odot$). These models almost entirely skip the standard Hayashi track evolution and deplete Li before the end of the accretion phase. The exact amount of depletion depends on the actual combination of the accretion parameters ($\dot{m}$, $M_{seed}$, and $R_{seed}$), achieving in some cases the complete exhaustion of Li in the whole star.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.