Paper detail

Prospects of GRB observations for CTA from a phenomenological model

Very high energy (VHE, i.e. $\gtrsim 10$ GeV) photons from Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), as high as 90 GeV in rest frame energy, have been detected by the $Fermi$ Large Area Telescope (LAT). This provides hope for a high statistics GRB detection by a ground-based instrument in the VHE domain. We here report on our estimates of the expected GRB detection rate and $γ$-ray rate (in case of detection) for the next generation ground-based Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs): the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). Moreover, we investigated the effect critical design parameters of CTA have on our predictions and we compare the performance of various observing strategies for the array pointing. Our estimations are based on a phenomenological model which uses temporal and spectral information from GRBs detected by $Fermi$-LAT as well as other instruments operating at lower energy. While detection of VHE emission from GRBs has eluded ground-based instruments thus far, our results suggest it should be within reach of CTA with a rate between 0.35 and 1.6 GRBs/year depending on the characteristics of the true GRB population and the performance that CTA will eventually achieve.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.