Paper detail

Prospect for precision measurements of MW+ -MW- & MW at the LHC: Shortcuts revisited

The claim that the W boson mass might be measured at the LHC with a precision of O(10 MeV) is critically reviewed. It is argued that such a precision cannot be achieved, unless a dedicated measurement program, specific to the LHC is pursued. We propose such a program. Its main target is to significantly improve the experimental control of the relative polarisation of the W+, W- and Z bosons. We propose to achieve this goal either by running dedicated isoscalar beams at the LHC or by running, in parallel to the standard p-p collision program, a dedicated muon scattering "LHC-support-experiment" at the CERN SPS. One of these auxiliary measurements is necessary for the "precision measurement program" at the LHC, but not sufficient. It must be followed by dedicated measurement strategies which are robust with respect to both the systematic measurement uncertainties and to the perturbative and non-perturbative QCD effects. We propose such strategies and evaluate their precision. At the LHC, contrary to the Tevatron case, both the masses of the W+ and of the W- bosons must be measured with high precision. In this context, we propose and evaluate LHC dedicated strategies to measure the difference of the masses of the W+ and W- bosons and of the absolute mass of the W boson assuming both masses are equal. We show how one can overcome the obstacles in measuring the masses of W+ and W- to a precision of 10 MeV. We present a detailed evaluation of the precision of the proposed methods based on the studies of a large, O(10^11), sample of simulated W and Z production events.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.