Paper detail

ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms

Motivation: To assess the quality of a protein model, i.e. to estimate how close it is to its native structure, using no other information than the structure of the model has been shown to be useful for structure prediction. The state of the art method, ProQ2, is based on a machine learning approach that uses a number of features calculated from a protein model. Here, we examine if these features can be exchanged with energy terms calculated from Rosetta and if a combination of these terms can improve the quality assessment. Results: When using the full atom energy function from Rosetta in ProQRosFA the QA is on par with our previous state-of-the-art method, ProQ2. The method based on the low-resolution centroid scoring function, ProQRosCen, performs almost as well and the combination of all the three methods, ProQ2, ProQRosFA and ProQCenFA into ProQ3 show superior performance over ProQ2. Availability: ProQ3 is freely available on BitBucket at https://bitbucket.org/ElofssonLab/proq3

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.