Paper detail

Properties of z~3-6 Lyman break galaxies. II. Testing star formation histories and the SFR-mass relation with ALMA and near-IR spectroscopy

We examine the dependence of derived physical parameters of distant Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) on the assumed star formation histories (SFHs), their implications on the SFR-mass relation, and we propose observational tests to better constrain these quantities. We use our SED-fitting tool including nebular emission to analyze a large sample of LBGs, assuming five different star formation histories, extending our first analysis of this sample (de Barros et al. 2012, paper I). In addition we predict the IR luminosities consistently with the SED fits. Compared to "standard" SED fits assuming constant SFR and neglecting nebular lines, assuming variable SFHs yield systematically lower stellar masses, higher extinction, higher SFR, higher IR luminosities, and a wider range of equivalent widths for optical emission lines. Exponentially declining and delayed SFHs yield basically identical results and generally fit best. Exponentially rising SFHs yield similar masses, but somewhat higher extinction. We find significant deviations between the derived SFR and IR luminosity from the commonly used SFR(IR) or SFR(IR+UV) calibration, due to differences in the SFHs and ages. Models with variable SFHs, favored statistically, yield generally a large scatter in the SFR-mass relation. We show that the true scatter in the SFR-mass relation can be significantly larger than inferred using SFR(UV) and/or SFR(IR). Different SFHs, and hence differences in the derived SFR-mass relation and in the specific star formation rates, can be tested/constrained observationally with future IR observations with ALMA. Measurement of emission lines, such as Halpha and [OII]3727, can also provide useful constraints on the SED models. We conclude that our findings of a large scatter in SFR-mass at high-z and an increase of the specific star formation rate above z>~3 (paper I) can be tested observationally. (abriged)

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.