Paper detail

Properties of the Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood {ROC} Model with a Monotonic Likelihood Ratio

We expect that some observers in perceptual signal detection experiments, such as radiologists, will make rational decisions, and therefore ratings from those observers are expected to form a convex ROC curve. However, measured and published curves are often not convex. This article examines the convexity-constrained nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator of the ROC curve given by Lloyd (2002). Like Lloyd we use the Pool Adjacent Violator Algorithm (PAVA) to construct the estimate of the convex curve. We present a direct proof that this estimate is a convex hull of the empirical ROC curve. The estimate is simple to construct by hand, and follows the suggestions by Pesce, et~al.~(2010). We examine the properties of this constrained nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) under a large number of experimental conditions. In particular we examine the behavior of the area under the curve which is often used as summary metric of diagnostic performance. This constrained ROC estimator gives an area under the curve (AUC) estimate that is biased high with respect to the usual empirical AUC estimate, but may be less biased with respect to the underlying continuous true AUC value. The constrained ROC estimator has lower variance than the usual empirical one. Unlike previous authors who used complex bootstrapping to estimate the variance of the constrained NPMLE we demonstrate that standard unbiased estimators of variance work well to estimate the variance of the NPMLE AUC.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.