Paper detail

Properties of the Lyman Alpha Clouds from non-equilibrium Photoionization Models

We investigate the thermal and ionization history of Lyman alpha clouds photoionized by a time--dependent UV background, including non equilibrium effects. The results show that it is possible to obtain temperatures as low as T~15000 K (or, equivalently, Doppler parameters b~15 km/s) at z=3 for cloud total densities n~10^-4 cm^-3, if (i) the reionization epoch occurred at z_i~10, and (ii) the UV background has a factor 70-100 decrease at the HeII edge. A trend towards smaller b with increasing redshift is present in the redshift interval z=1-5. Higher densities lead to higher values of b and smaller hydrogen correction factors, n_{HII}/n_{HI}. The correction factors for helium are also given. For a hydrogen column density N_{HI}=3 10^{14} cm^{-2}, cloud sizes are larger than 100 kpc, consistent with recent observations of quasar pairs. Pressure confined models, instead, yield implausibly low cloud densities at low redshift, and too small sizes at intermediate redshift. The implications of the model are confronted with the available observational data.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.