Paper detail

Properties of IR selected Active Galactic Nuclei

Context. Active galactic nuclei (AGN) of galaxies play an important role in the life and evolution of galaxies due to the impact they exert on certain properties and the evolutionary path of galaxies. It is well known that infrared (IR) emission is useful for selecting galaxies with AGNs, although it has been observed that there is contamination by star-forming galaxies. Aims. In this work we investigate galaxy properties hosting AGNs identified at mid and near-IR wavelengths. The sample of AGNs selected at IR wavelengths was confirmed using optical spectroscopy and X-ray photometry. We study the near-UV, optical, near and mid-IR (MIR) properties, as well as [O III] λ5007 luminosity, black hole mass and morphology properties of optical and IR colour selected AGNs. Methods. We selected AGN candidates using two mid-IR colour selection techniques, a power-law emission method and a combination of mid and near-IR selection techniques. We confirm the AGN selection with two line diagnostic diagrams that use the ratio [O III]/H\b{eta} and the emission line width σ [O III] (kinematics-excitation diagram, KEx) and the host galaxy stellar mass (mass-excitation diagram, MEx), as well as X-ray photometry. Results. According to the diagnostic diagrams, the methods with the greatest success in selecting AGNs are those that use a combination of a mid and near-IR selection technique and a power-law emission. The method that use a combination of mid and near-IR observation selects a large number of AGNs, and is reasonably efficient in both the success rate (61%) and total number of AGN recovered. We also find that the KEx method presents contamination of SF galaxies within the AGN selection box. According to morphological studies based on the Sérsic index, AGN samples have higher percentages of galaxy morphologies with bulge+disk components compared to galaxies without AGNs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.