Paper detail

Properties of Interstellar Turbulence from Gradients of Linear Radio Polarization Maps

Faraday rotation of linearly polarized radio signals provides a very sensitive probe of fluctuations in the interstellar magnetic field and ionized gas density resulting from magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence. We used a set of statistical tools to analyze images of the spatial gradient of linearly polarized radio emission ($|\nabla \textbf{P}|$) from the ISM for both observational data from a test image of the Southern Galactic Plane Survey (SGPS) and isothermal simulations of MHD turbulence. We compared the observational data with results of synthetic observations obtained with the simulations of 3D turbulence. Visually, in both data sets, a complex network of filamentary structures is seen. Our analysis shows that the filaments in the gradient can be produced by shocks as well as random fluctuations characterizing the non-differentiable field of MHD turbulence. The latter dominates for subsonic turbulence, while the former dominates for supersonic turbulence. In order to quantitatively characterize these differences we use the topology tool known as a genus curve as well as the moments of the image distribution. We find that higher values for the moments correspond to cases of $|\nabla \textbf{P}|$ with larger Mach numbers, but the strength of the dependency is connected to the telescope angular resolution. In regards to the topology, the supersonic filaments observed in $|\nabla \textbf{P}|$ have a positive genus shift, which indicates a "swisscheese" like topology, while the subsonic cases show a negative genus, indicating a "clump" like topology. In the case of the genus, the dependency on the telescope resolution is not as strong. The SGPS test region data has a distribution and morphology that matches subsonic to transsonic type turbulence, which independently confirms what is now expected for the WIM.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.