Paper detail

Properties of Dust Grains Probed with Extinction Curves

Modern data of the extinction curve from the ultraviolet to the near infrared are revisited to study the property of dust grains in the Milky Way (MW) and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). We confirm that the graphite-silicate mixture of grains yields the observed extinction curve with the simple power-law distribution of the grain size but with a cutoff at some maximal size: the parameters are tightly constrained to be $q = 3.5 \pm 0.2$ for the size distribution $a^{-q}$ and the maximum radius $a_{max} = 0.24 \pm 0.05$ um, for both MW and SMC. The abundance of grains, and hence the elemental abundance, is constrained from the reddening versus hydrogen column density, E(B-V)/N_H. If we take the solar elemental abundance as the standard for the MW, >56 % of carbon should be in graphite dust, while it is <40 % in the SMC using its available abundance estimate. This disparity and the relative abundance of C to Si explain the difference of the two curves. We find that 50-60 % of carbon may not necessarily be in graphite but in the amorphous or the glassy phase. Iron may also be in the metallic phase or up to ~80 % in magnetite rather than in silicates, so that the Mg/Fe ratio in astronomical olivine is arbitrary. With these substitutions the parameters of the grain size remain unchanged. The mass density of dust grains relative to hydrogen is $ρ_{dust}/ρ_H = 1/(120 {+10 \atop -16})$ for the MW and $1/(760 {+70 \atop -90}) for the SMC under some abundance constraints. We underline the importance of the wavelength-dependence slope of the extinction curve in the near infrared in constructing the dust model: if $A_λ \propto λ^{-gamma}$ with gamma ~ 1.6, the power-law grain-size model fails, whereas it works if gamma ~ 1.8-2.0.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.