Paper detail

Properties of Codes in the Johnson Scheme

Codes which attain the sphere packing bound are called perfect codes. The most important metrics in coding theory on which perfect codes are defined are the Hamming metric and the Johnson metric. While for the Hamming metric all perfect codes over finite fields are known, in the Johnson metric it was conjectured by Delsarte in 1970's that there are no nontrivial perfect codes. The general nonexistence proof still remains the open problem. In this work we examine constant weight codes as well as doubly constant weight codes, and reduce the range of parameters in which perfect codes may exist in both cases. We start with the constant weight codes. We introduce an improvement of Roos' bound for one-perfect codes, and present some new divisibility conditions, which are based on the connection between perfect codes in Johnson graph J(n,w) and block designs. Next, we consider binomial moments for perfect codes. We show which parameters can be excluded for one-perfect codes. We examine two-perfect codes in J(2w,w) and present necessary conditions for existence of such codes. We prove that there are no two-perfect codes in J(2w,w) with length less then 2.5*10^{15}. Next we examine perfect doubly constant weight codes. We present a family of parameters for codes whose size of sphere divides the size of whole space. We then prove a bound on length of such codes, similarly to Roos' bound for perfect codes in Johnson graph. Finally we describe Steiner systems and doubly Steiner systems, which are strongly connected with the constant weight and doubly constant weight codes respectively. We provide an anticode-based proof of a bound on length of Steiner system, prove that doubly Steiner system is a diameter perfect code and present a bound on length of doubly Steiner system.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.