Paper detail

Properties of carbon stars in the Solar neighbourhood based on Gaia DR2 astrometry

We find that the combined LF of N- and SC-type stars are consistent with a Gaussian distribution peaking at M_bol~ -5.2 mag. The resulting LF however shows two tails at lower and higher luminosities more extended than those previously found, indicating that AGB carbon stars with Solar metallicity may reach M_bol~-6.0 mag. We find that J-type stars are about half a magnitude fainter on average than N- and SC-type stars, while R-hot stars are half a magnitude brighter than previously found. The Galactic spatial distribution and velocity components of the N-, SC- and J-type stars are very similar, while about 30 % of the R-hot stars in the sample are located at distances larger than ~ 500 pc from the Galactic Plane, and show a significant drift with respect to the local standard of rest. The LF derived for N- and SC-type in the Solar neighbourhood fully agrees with the expected luminosity of stars of 1.5-3 M_o on the AGB. On a theoretical basis, the existence of an extended low luminosity tail would require a contribution of extrinsic low mass carbon stars, while the high luminosity one would imply that stars with mass up to ~5 Mo may become carbon star on the AGB. J-type stars not only differ significantly in their chemical composition with respect to the N- and SC-types but also in their LF, which reinforces the idea that these carbon stars belong to a dvifferent type whose origin is still unknown. The derived luminosities of R-hot stars make these stars unlikely to be in the red-clump as previously claimed. On the other hand, the derived spatial distribution and kinematic properties, together with their metallicity, indicate that most of the N-, SC- and J-type stars belong to the thin disc population, while a significant fraction of R-hot stars show characteristics compatible with the thick disc.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.