Paper detail

Properties of Carbon-Oxygen White Dwarfs From Monte Carlo Stellar Models

We investigate properties of carbon-oxygen white dwarfs with respect to the composite uncertainties in the reaction rates using the stellar evolution toolkit, Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) and the probability density functions in the reaction rate library STARLIB. These are the first Monte Carlo stellar evolution studies that use complete stellar models. Focusing on 3 M$_{\odot}$ models evolved from the pre main-sequence to the first thermal pulse, we survey the remnant core mass, composition, and structure properties as a function of 26 STARLIB reaction rates covering hydrogen and helium burning using a Principal Component Analysis and Spearman Rank-Order Correlation. Relative to the arithmetic mean value, we find the width of the 95\% confidence interval to be $ΔM_{\rm 1TP}$ $\approx$ 0.019 M$_{\odot}$ for the core mass at the first thermal pulse, $Δ$$t_{\rm{1TP}}$ $\approx$ 12.50 Myr for the age, $Δ\log(T_{\rm c}/{\rm K}) \approx$ 0.013 for the central temperature, $Δ\log(ρ_{\rm c}/{\rm g \ cm}^{-3}) \approx$ 0.060 for the central density, $ΔY_{\rm{e,c}} \approx$ 2.6$\times$10$^{-5}$ for the central electron fraction, $ΔX_{\rm c}(^{22}\rm{Ne}) \approx$ 5.8$\times$10$^{-4}$, $ΔX_{\rm c}(^{12}\rm{C}) \approx$ 0.392, and $ΔX_{\rm c}(^{16}\rm{O}) \approx$ 0.392. Uncertainties in the experimental $^{12}$C($α,γ)^{16}\rm{O}$, triple-$α$, and $^{14}$N($p,γ)^{15}\rm{O}$ reaction rates dominate these variations. We also consider a grid of 1 to 6 M$_{\odot}$ models evolved from the pre main-sequence to the final white dwarf to probe the sensitivity of the initial-final mass relation to experimental uncertainties in the hydrogen and helium reaction rates.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.