Paper detail

Properties and evolution of NEO families created by tidal disruption at Earth

We have calculated the coherence and detectable lifetimes of synthetic near-Earth object (NEO) families created by catastrophic disruption of a progenitor as it suffers a very close Earth approach. The closest or slowest approaches yield the most violent `s-class' disruption events. We found that the average slope of the absolute magnitude (H) distribution, $N(H)\propto10^{(0.55\pm0.04)\,H}$, for the fragments in the s-class families is steeper than the slope of the NEO population \citep{mainzer2011} in the same size range. The families remain coherent as statistically significant clusters of orbits within the NEO population for an average of $\barτ_c = (14.7\pm0.6)\times10^3$ years after disruption. The s-class families are detectable with the techniques developed by \citet{fu2005} and \citet{Schunova2012} for an average duration ($\barτ_{det}$) ranging from about 2,000 to about 12,000 years for progenitors in the absolute magnitude ($H_p$) range from 20 to 13 corresponding to diameters in the range from about 0.5 to 10$\km$ respectively. The short detectability lifetime explains why zero NEO families have been discovered to-date. Nonetheless, every tidal disruption event of a progenitor with D$>0.5\km$ is capable of producing several million fragments in the $1\meter$ to $10\meter$ diameter range that can contribute to temporary local density enhancements of small NEOs in Earth's vicinity. We expect that there are about 1,200 objects in the steady state NEO population in this size range due to tidal disruption assuming that one $1\km$ diameter NEO tidally disrupts at Earth every 2,500 years. These objects may be suitable targets for asteroid retrieval missions due to their Earth-like orbits with corresponding low $v_{\infty}$. The fragments from the tidal disruptions at Earth have $\sim5\times$ the collision probability with Earth compared to the background NEO population.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.