Paper detail

Proper Motion of the Leo II Dwarf Galaxy Based On Hubble Space Telescope Imaging

This article reports a measurement of the proper motion of Leo II, a dwarf galaxy that is a likely satellite of the Milky Way, based on imaging with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3. The measurement uses compact background galaxies as standards of rest in both channels of the camera for two distinct pointings of the telescope and a QSO in one channel for each pointing, resulting in the weighted average of six measurements. The measured proper motion in the the equatorial coordinate system is (mu_alpha, mu_delta) = (-6.9 +- 3.7, -8.7 +- 3.9) mas/century and in the Galactic coordinate system is (mu_l, mu_b) = (6.2 +- 3.9, -9.2 +- 3.7) mas/century. The implied space velocity with respect to the Galactic center is (Pi, Theta, Z) = (-37 +- 38, 117 +- 43, 40 +- 16) km/s or, expressed in Galactocentric radial and tangential components, (V_r, V_tan) = (21.9 +- 1.5, 127 +- 42) km/s. The space velocity implies that the instantaneous orbital inclination is 68 degrees, with a 95% confidence interval of (66 deg, 80 deg). The measured motion supports the hypothesis that Leo II, Leo IV, Leo V, Crater 2, and the globular cluster Crater fell into the Milky Way as a group.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.