Paper detail

Proper Mergings of Stars and Chains are Counted by Sums of Antidiagonals in Certain Convolution Arrays -- The Details

A proper merging of two disjoint quasi-ordered sets $P$ and $Q$ is a quasi-order on the union of $P$ and $Q$ such that the restriction to $P$ or $Q$ yields the original quasi-order again and such that no elements of $P$ and $Q$ are identified. In this article, we determine the number of proper mergings in the case where $P$ is a star (i.e. an antichain with a smallest element adjoined), and $Q$ is a chain. We show that the lattice of proper mergings of an $m$-antichain and an $n$-chain, previously investigated by the author, is a quotient lattice of the lattice of proper mergings of an $m$-star and an $n$-chain, and we determine the number of proper mergings of an $m$-star and an $n$-chain by counting the number of congruence classes and by determining their cardinalities. Additionally, we compute the number of Galois connections between certain modified Boolean lattices and chains.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.