Paper detail

Proper image subtraction - optimal transient detection, photometry and hypothesis testing

Transient detection and flux measurement via image subtraction stand at the base of time domain astronomy. Due to the varying seeing conditions, the image subtraction process is non-trivial, and existing solutions suffer from a variety of problems. Starting from basic statistical principles, we develop the optimal statistic for transient detection, flux measurement and any image-difference hypothesis testing. We derive a closed-form statistic that: (i) Is mathematically proven to be the optimal transient detection statistic in the limit of background-dominated noise; (ii) Is numerically stable; (iii) For accurately registered, adequately sampled images, does not leave subtraction or deconvolution artifacts; (iv) Allows automatic transient detection to the theoretical sensitivity limit by providing credible detection significance; (v) Has uncorrelated white noise; (vi) Is a sufficient statistic for any further statistical test on the difference image, and in particular, allows to distinguish particle hits and other image artifacts from real transients; (vii) Is symmetric to the exchange of the new and reference images; (viii) Is at least an order of magnitude faster to compute than some popular methods; and (ix) Is straightforward to implement. Furthermore, we present extensions of this method that make it resilient to registration errors, color-refraction errors, and any noise source that can be modelled. In addition, we show that the optimal way to prepare a reference image is the proper image coaddition presented in Zackay \& Ofek (2015b). We demonstrate this method on simulated data and real observations from the Palomar Transient Factory data release 2. We provide an implementation of this algorithm in MATLAB and Python.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.