Paper detail

Proper formulation of viscous dissipation for nonlinear waves in solids

In order to model nonlinear viscous dissipative motions in solids, acoustical physicists usually add terms linear in dot{E}, the material time derivative of the Lagrangian strain tensor E, to the elastic stress tensor sigma derived from the expansion to the third- (sometimes fourth-) order of the strain energy density e=e(trace(E), trace(E^2), trace(E^3)). Here, it is shown that this practice, which has been widely used in the past three decades or so, is physically wrong for at least two reasons, and that it should be corrected. One reason is that the elastic stress tensor sigma is not symmetric while dot{E) is symmetric, so that motions for which sigma + sigma^T <> 0 will give rise to elastic stresses which have no viscous pendant. Another reason is that dot{E} is frame-invariant, while sigma is not, so that an observer transformation would alter the elastic part of the total stress differently than it would alter the dissipative part, thereby violating the fundamental principle of material frame-indifference. These problems can have serious consequences for nonlinear shear wave propagation in soft solids, as seen here with an example of a kink in almost incompressible soft solids.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.