Paper detail

Proper conflict-free coloring of sparse graphs

A {\it proper conflict-free $c$-coloring} of a graph is a proper $c$-coloring such that each non-isolated vertex has a color appearing exactly once on its neighborhood. This notion was formally introduced by Fabrici et al., who proved that planar graphs have a proper conflict-free 8-coloring and constructed a planar graph with no proper conflict-free 5-coloring. Caro, Petruševski, and Škrekovski investigated this coloring concept further, and in particular studied upper bounds on the maximum average degree that guarantees a proper conflict-free $c$-coloring for $c\in\{4,5,6\}$. Along these lines, we completely determine the threshold on the maximum average degree of a graph $G$, denoted $mad(G)$, that guarantees a proper conflict-free $c$-coloring for all $c$ and also provide tightness examples. Namely, for $c\geq 5$ we prove that a graph $G$ with $mad(G)\leq \frac{4c}{c+2}$ has a proper conflict-free $c$-coloring, unless $G$ contains a $1$-subdivision of the complete graph on $c+1$ vertices. When $c=4$, we show that a graph $G$ with $mad(G)<\frac{12}{5}$ has a proper conflict-free $4$-coloring, unless $G$ contains an induced $5$-cycle. In addition, we show that a planar graph with girth at least 5 has a proper conflict-free $7$-coloring.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.