Paper detail

Propagation of a plane-strain hydraulic fracture accounting for a rough cohesive zone

The quasi-brittle nature of rocks challenges the basic assumptions of linear hydraulic fracture mechanics (LHFM): linear elastic fracture mechanics and smooth parallel plates lubrication fluid flow. We relax these hypotheses and investigate the growth of a plane-strain hydraulic fracture in an impermeable medium accounting for a rough cohesive zone and a fluid lag. In addition to a dimensionless toughness and the time-scale of coalescence of the fluid and fracture fronts as in the LHFM case, the solution now also depends on the in-situ-to-cohesive stress ratio and the intensity of the flow deviation induced by aperture roughness. The solution is appropriately described by a nucleation time-scale, which delineates the fracture growth into a nucleation phase, an intermediate stage and a late time stage where convergence toward LHFM predictions finally occurs. A highly non-linear hydro-mechanical coupling takes place as the fluid front enters the rough cohesive zone which itself evolves during the nucleation and intermediate stages. This coupling leads to significant additional viscous flow dissipation. As a result, the fracture evolution deviates from LHFM solutions with shorter fracture lengths, larger widths and net pressures. These deviations ultimately decrease at late times as the lag and cohesive zone fractions both become smaller. The deviations increase with larger dimensionless toughness and in-situ-to-cohesive stress ratio, as both further localize viscous dissipation near the fluid front located in the rough cohesive zone. The convergence toward LHFM can occur at very late time for realistic values of in-situ-to-cohesive stress ratio encountered at depth. The impact of a rough cohesive zone appears to be prominent for laboratory experiments and short in-situ injections in quasi-brittle rocks with ultimately a larger energy demand compared to LHFM predictions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.