Paper detail

Proofs of Two Conjectures by Mecke for Mixed Line-Generated Tessellations

For a compact and convex window, Mecke described a process of tessellations which arise from cell divisions in discrete time. At each time step, one of the existing cells is selected according to an equally-likely law. Independently, a line is thrown onto the window. If the line hits the selected cell the cell is divided. If the line does not hit the selected cell nothing happens in that time step. With a geometric distribution whose parameter depends on the time, Mecke transformed his construction into a continuous-time model. He put forward two conjectures in which he assumed this continuous-time model to have certain properties with respect to their iteration. These conjectures lead to a third conjecture which states the equivalence of the construction of STIT tessellations and Mecke's construction under some homogeneity conditions. In the present paper, the first two conjectures are proven. A key tool to do that is a property of a continuous-time version of the equally-likely model classified by Cowan.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.