Paper detail

Proof of the Goldberg-Seymour Conjecture on Edge-Colorings of Multigraphs

Given a multigraph $G=(V,E)$, the {\em edge-coloring problem} (ECP) is to color the edges of $G$ with the minimum number of colors so that no two adjacent edges have the same color. This problem can be naturally formulated as an integer program, and its linear programming relaxation is called the {\em fractional edge-coloring problem} (FECP). In the literature, the optimal value of ECP (resp. FECP) is called the {\em chromatic index} (resp. {\em fractional chromatic index}) of $G$, denoted by $χ'(G)$ (resp. $χ^*(G)$). Let $Δ(G)$ be the maximum degree of $G$ and let \[Γ(G)=\max \Big\{\frac{2|E(U)|}{|U|-1}:\,\, U \subseteq V, \,\, |U|\ge 3 \hskip 2mm {\rm and \hskip 2mm odd} \Big\},\] where $E(U)$ is the set of all edges of $G$ with both ends in $U$. Clearly, $\max\{Δ(G), \, \lceil Γ(G) \rceil \}$ is a lower bound for $χ'(G)$. As shown by Seymour, $χ^*(G)=\max\{Δ(G), \, Γ(G)\}$. In the 1970s Goldberg and Seymour independently conjectured that $χ'(G) \le \max\{Δ(G)+1, \, \lceil Γ(G) \rceil\}$. Over the past four decades this conjecture, a cornerstone in modern edge-coloring, has been a subject of extensive research, and has stimulated a significant body of work. In this paper we present a proof of this conjecture. Our result implies that, first, there are only two possible values for $χ'(G)$, so an analogue to Vizing's theorem on edge-colorings of simple graphs, a fundamental result in graph theory, holds for multigraphs; second, although it is $NP$-hard in general to determine $χ'(G)$, we can approximate it within one of its true value, and find it exactly in polynomial time when $Γ(G)>Δ(G)$; third, every multigraph $G$ satisfies $χ'(G)-χ^*(G) \le 1$, so FECP has a fascinating integer rounding property.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.