Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures II: the bipartite case

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

In a sequence of four papers, we prove the following results (via a unified approach) for all sufficiently large nn: (i) [1-factorization conjecture] Suppose that nn is even and D≥2⌈n/4⌉−1D \geq 2\lceil n/4\rceil -1. Then every DD-regular graph GG on nn vertices has a decomposition into perfect matchings. Equivalently, χ′(G)=Dχ'(G)=D. (ii) [Hamilton decomposition conjecture] Suppose that D≥⌊n/2⌋D \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor . Then every DD-regular graph GG on nn vertices has a decomposition into Hamilton cycles and at most one perfect matching. (iii) [Optimal packings of Hamilton cycles] Suppose that GG is a graph on nn vertices with minimum degree δ≥n/2δ\ge n/2. Then GG contains at least regeven(n,δ)/2≥(n−2)/8{\rm reg}_{\rm even}(n,δ)/2 \ge (n-2)/8 edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. Here regeven(n,δ){\rm reg}_{\rm even}(n,δ) denotes the degree of the largest even-regular spanning subgraph one can guarantee in a graph on nn vertices with minimum degree δδ. According to Dirac, (i) was first raised in the 1950s. (ii) and the special case δ=⌈n/2⌉δ= \lceil n/2 \rceil of (iii) answer questions of Nash-Williams from 1970. All of the above bounds are best possible. In the current paper, we prove the above results for the case when GG is close to a complete balanced bipartite graph.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.