Paper detail

Prompt GRB spectra: detailed calculations and the effect of pair production

We present detailed calculations of the prompt spectrum of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) predicted within the fireball model framework, where emission is due to internal shocks in an expanding relativistic wind. Our time dependent numerical model describes cyclo-synchrotron emission and absorption, inverse and direct Compton scattering, and e^\pm pair production and annihilation (including the evolution of high energy electro-magnetic cascades). It allows, in particular, a self-consistent calculation of the energy distribution of e^\pm pairs produced by photon annihilation, and hence a calculation of the spectra resulting when the scattering optical depth due to pairs, τ_\pm, is high. We show that emission peaks at ~1MeV for moderate to large τ_\pm, reaching τ_\pm ~ 10^2. In this regime of large compactness we find that (i) A large fraction of shock energy can escape as radiation even for large τ_\pm; (ii) The spectrum depends only weakly on the magnetic field energy fraction; (iii) The spectrum is hard, epsilon^2 dN/depsilon \propto epsilon^αwith 0.5<α<1, between the self absorption (epsilon_{ssa}= 10^{0.5\pm0.5} keV) and peak (epsilon_{peak}= 10^{0.5\pm0.5} MeV) photon energy, (iv) and shows a sharp cutoff at ~10 MeV; (v) Thermal Comptonization leads to emission peaking at epsilon_peak>=30 MeV, and can not therefore account for observed GRB spectra. For small compactness, spectra extend to >10 GeV with flux detectable by GLAST, and the spectrum at low energy depends on the magnetic field energy fraction. Comparison of the flux at ~1 GeV and ~ 100 keV may therefore allow to determine the magnetic field strength. For both small and large compactness, the spectra depend only weakly on the spectral index of the energy distribution of accelerated electrons.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.