Paper detail

Projection effects in cluster catalogues

We investigate the importance of projection effects in the identification of galaxy clusters in 2D galaxy maps and their effect on the estimation of cluster velocity dispersions. A volume limited galaxy catalogue that was derived from a Standard CDM N-body simulation was used. We select clusters using criteria that match those employed in the construction of real cluster catalogues and find that our mock Abell cluster catalogues are heavily contaminated and incomplete. Over one third (34 per cent) of clusters of richness class R>=1 are miclassifications arising from the projection of one or more clumps onto an intrinsically poor cluster. Conversely, 32 per cent of intrinsically rich clusters are missed from the R>=1 catalogues, mostly because of statistical fluctuations in the background count. Selection by X-ray luminosity rather than optical richness reduces, but does not completely eliminate, these problems. Contamination by unvirialised sub-clumps near a cluster leads to a considerable overestimation of the cluster velocity dispersion, even if the analysis is restricted only to galaxies close to the cluster centre. Thus, the distribution of cluster masses - often used to test cosmological models - is a highly unreliable statistic. However, the median value of the distribution is considerably more robust. Improved estimates of the cluster velocity dispersion distribution require constructing new cluster catalogues in which clusters are defined according to the number of galaxies within a radius about three times smaller than the Abell radius.

preprint1997arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.