Paper detail

Progenitors of type Ia supernovae and the metallicity distribution of G-type dwarfs

We investigate the contribution to the formation of type Ia supernovae of the single (a white dwarf accreting from a non-degenerate companion) and double (two merging white dwarfs) degenerate scenario, as well as various aspects of the binary evolution process leading to such a progenitor system. We aim to get a better insight into uncertainties and parameter spaces by means of a combined modelization, resulting in a reduction of the number of possible model approaches. This exclusion of parts of the parameter space is, as will be shown, often independent of uncertainties in the modelization. We use the combination of a population synthesis code with detailed binary evolution and a galactic chemical evolution model to predict the metallicity distribution of G-type dwarfs in the solar neighborhood. Because of the very long lifetime of these stars, this distribution is a good indicator of the entire chemical history of a region. By comparing the observed distribution with those predicted by assuming different type Ia supernova progenitors and evolutionary parameters (e.g. concerning mass and angular momentum loss and common envelope evolution), it is possible to constrain the possible combinations of assumptions. We find that in order to reproduce the observed G-dwarf metallicity distribution, it is absolutely necessary to include both the single and double degenerate scenario. The best match is obtained when all merging C-O white dwarfs contribute to the latter. The correspondence is also critically dependent on the assumptions about galaxy and star formation, e.g. the use of the two-infall model vs. a constant star formation rate. However, this does not affect the previous conclusion, which is consistent with the results obtained by investigating type Ia supernova delay time distributions in starburst galaxies.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.