Paper detail

Progenitor mass constraints for core-collapse supernovae from correlations with host galaxy star formation

Using H-alpha emission as a tracer of on-going (<16 Myr old) and near-UV emission as a tracer of recent (16-100 Myr old) star formation (SF), we present constraints on core-collapse (CC) supernova (SN) progenitors through their association with SF regions. We present statistics of a large sample of SNe; 163.5 type II (58 IIP, 13 IIL, 13.5 IIb, 19 IIn and 12 &#39;impostors&#39;) and 96.5 type Ib/c (39.5 Ib and 52 Ic). Using pixel statistics our main findings and conclusions are: 1) An increasing progenitor mass sequence is observed, implied from an increasing association of SNe to host galaxy H-alpha emission. This commences with the type Ia (SNIa) showing the weakest association, followed by the SNII, then the SNIb, with the SNIc showing the strongest correlation to SF regions. Thus our progenitor mass sequence runs Ia-II-Ib-Ic. 2) Overall SNIbc are found to occur nearer to bright HII regions than SNII. This implies that the former have shorter stellar lifetimes thus arising from more massive progenitor stars. 3) While SNIIP do not closely follow the on-going SF, they accurately trace the recent formation. This implies that their progenitors arise from stars at the low end of the CC SN mass sequence, consistent with direct detections of progenitors in pre-explosion imaging. 4) Similarly SNIIn trace recent but not the on-going SF. This implies that, contrary to the general consensus, the majority of these SNe do not arise from the most massive stars. Results and constraints are also presented for the less numerous SNIIL, IIb, and &#39;impostors&#39;. Finally we present analysis of possible biases in the data, the results of which argue strongly against any selection effects that could explain the relative excess of SNIbc within bright HII regions. Thus intrinsic progenitor differences in the sense of the mass sequence we propose remain the most plausible explanation of our findings.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

Progenitor mass constraints for core-collapse supernovae from correlations with host galaxy star formation | BZPEER | BZPEER