Paper detail

Profit Maximization using Social Networks in Two-Phase Setting

Now-a-days, \emph{Online Social Networks} have been predominantly used by commercial houses for viral marketing where the goal is to maximize profit. In this paper, we study the problem of Profit Maximization in the two\mbox{-}phase setting. The input to the problem is a \emph{social network} where the users are associated with a cost and benefit value, and a fixed amount of budget splitted into two parts. Here, the cost and the benefit associated with a node signify its incentive demand and the amount of benefit that can be earned by influencing that user, respectively. The goal of this problem is to find out the optimal seed sets for both phases such that the aggregated profit at the end of the diffusion process is maximized. First, we develop a mathematical model based on the \emph{Independent Cascade Model} of diffusion that captures the aggregated profit in an \emph{expected} sense. Subsequently, we show that selecting an optimal seed set for the first phase even considering the optimal seed set for the second phase can be selected efficiently, is an $\textsf{NP}$-Hard Problem. Next, we propose two solution methodologies, namely the \emph{single greedy} and the \emph{double greedy} approach for our problem that works based on marginal gain computation. A detailed analysis of both methodologies has been done to understand their time and space requirements. We perform an extensive set of experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approaches with real-world datasets. From the experiments, we observe that the proposed solution approaches lead to more profit compared to the baseline methods and in particular, the double greedy approach leads to up to $5 \%$ improvement compared to its single\mbox{-}phase counterpart.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.