Paper detail

Production of high purity $^{52g}$Mn from $^{nat}$V targets with $α$-beams at cyclotrons

Radioisotope $^{52g}$Mn is of special interest for multimodal imaging. Using state-of-art nuclear reaction codes, we study the alternative nuclear reaction route $^{nat}$V($α$,x)$^{52g}$Mn in comparison with the standard production routes based upon the use of chromium targets. The integral yields of $^{52g}$Mn and contaminants have been evaluated. The main outcome of this investigation is that the production of the main contaminant isotope $^{54}$Mn is expected to be lower than with $^{nat}$Cr. The study also reveals a large spread in the cross-section data set and points out the need of more precise measurements of the reaction $^{nat}$V($α$,x)$^{52g}$Mn as well as the need of a more accurate theoretical description.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.