Production of 4Li^4{\rm Li} and p ⁣− ⁣3Hep\!-\!^3{\rm He} correlation function in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

The thermal and coalescence models both describe well yields of light nuclei produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at LHC. We propose to measure the yield of 4Li^4{\rm Li} and compare it to that of 4He^4{\rm He} to falsify one of the models. Since the masses of 4He^4{\rm He} and 4Li^4{\rm Li} are almost equal, the yield of 4Li^4{\rm Li} is about 5 times bigger than that of 4He^4{\rm He} in the thermal model because of different numbers of spin states of the two nuclides. Their internal structures are, however, very different: the alpha particle is well bound and compact while 4Li^4{\rm Li} is weakly bound and loose. Consequently, the ratio of yields of 4Li^4{\rm Li} to 4He^4{\rm He} is significantly smaller in the coalescence model and it strongly depends on the collision centrality. Since the nuclide 4Li^4{\rm Li} is unstable and it decays into 3He^3{\rm He} and pp, the yield of 4Li^4{\rm Li} can be experimentally obtained through a measurement of the p ⁣− ⁣3Hep\!-\!^3{\rm He} correlation function. The function carries information not only about the yield of 4Li^4{\rm Li} but also about the source of 3He^3{\rm He} and allows one to determine through a source-size measurement whether of 3He^3{\rm He} is directly emitted from the fireball or it is formed afterwards. We compute the correlation function taking into account the s−s-wave scattering and Coulomb repulsion together with the resonance interaction responsible for the 4Li^4{\rm Li} nuclide. We discuss how to infer information about an origin of 3He^3{\rm He} from the correlation function, and finally a method to obtain the yield of 4Li^4{\rm Li} is proposed.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.