Paper detail

Proceedings Third International Workshop on Classical Logic and Computation

The fact that classical mathematical proofs of simply existential statements can be read as programs was established by Goedel and Kreisel half a century ago. But the possibility of extracting useful computational content from classical proofs was taken seriously only from the 1990s on when it was discovered that proof interpretations based on Goedel's and Kreisel's ideas can provide new nontrivial algorithms and numerical results, and the Curry-Howard correspondence can be extended to classical logic via programming concepts such as continuations and control operators. The workshop series "Classical Logic and Computation" aims to support a fruitful exchange of ideas between the various lines of research on computational aspects of classical logic. This volume contains the abstracts of the invited lectures and the accepted contributed papers of the third CL&C workshop which was held jointly with the workshop "Program Extraction and Constructive Mathematics" at the University of Brno in August 21-22, 2010, as a satellite of CSL and MFCS. The workshops were held in honour of Helmut Schwichtenberg who became "professor emeritus" in September 2010. The topics of the papers include the foundations, optimizations and applications of proof interpretations such as Hilbert's epsilon substitution method, Goedel's functional interpretation, learning based realizability and negative translations as well as special calculi and theories capturing computational and complexity-theoretic aspects of classical logic such as the lambda-mu-calculus, applicative theories, sequent-calculi, resolution and cut-elimination

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.