Paper detail

Problems with Pencils: Lensing Covariance of Supernova Distance Measurements

While luminosity distances from Type Ia supernovae (SNe) provide a powerful probe of cosmological parameters, the accuracy with which these distances can be measured is limited by cosmic magnification due to gravitational lensing by the intervening large-scale structure. Spatial clustering of foreground mass fluctuations leads to correlated errors in distance estimates from SNe. By including the full covariance matrix of supernova distance measurements, we show that a future survey covering more than a few square degrees on the sky, and assuming a total of ~2000 SNe, will be largely unaffected by covariance noise. ``Pencil beam'' surveys with small fields of view, however, will be prone to the lensing covariance, leading to potentially significant degradations in cosmological parameter estimates. For a survey with 30 arcmin mean separation between SNe, lensing covariance leads to a ~45% increase in the expected errors in dark energy parameters compared to fully neglecting lensing, and a ~20% increase compared to including just the lensing variance. Given that the lensing covariance is cosmology dependent and cannot be mapped out sufficiently accurately with direct weak lensing observations, surveys with small mean SN separation must incorporate the effects of lensing covariance, including its dependence on the cosmological parameters.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.