Paper detail

Problems on neat embeddings solved by rainbow constructions and Monk algebras

This paper is a survey of recent results and methods in (Tarskian) algebraic logic. We focus on cylindric algebras. Fix 2<n<ω. Rainbow constructions are used to solve problems on classes consisting of algebras having a neat embedding property substantially generalizing seminal results of Hodkinson as well as Hirsch and Hodkinson on atom-canonicity and complete representations, respectively. For proving non-atom-canonicity of infinitely many varieties approximating the variety of representable algebras of dimension n, so-called blow up and blur constructions are used. Rainbow constructions are compared to constructions using Monk-like algebras and cases where both constructions work are given. When splitting methods fail. rainbow constructions are used to show that diagonal free varieties of representable diagonal free algebras of finite dimension n, do no admit universal axiomatizations containing only finitely many variables. Notions of representability, like complete, weak and strong are lifted from atom structures to atomic algebras and investigated in terms of neat embedding properties. The classical results of Monk and Maddux on non-finite axiomatizability of the classes of representable relation and cylindric algebras of finite dimension n are reproved using also a blow up and blur construction. Applications to n-variable fragments of first order logic are given. The main results of the paper are summarized in tabular form at the end of the paper.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.