Paper detail

Probing Turbulence in the Interstellar Medium using Radio-Interferometric Observations of Neutral Hydrogen

We develop a visibility based power spectrum estimator to probe the power spectrum directly from the interferometric observations and also estimate the errors in it. A numerical simulation of synthetic observations is also performed to access the efficacy and limitations of this estimator. We use this estimator to evaluate the power spectrum of three individual spiral galaxies, a dwarf galaxy sample and THINGS * spiral galaxies. In each case, the power spectrum is found to follow a power law PHI (U) = AU α over a specific length scale range. The estimated value for the slope α ranges from ~ ~1.5 to ~ -2.6 for the sample of dwarf galaxies. We interpret this bi-modality as arising due to 2D turbulence on length scales much larger than the scale-height of the galaxy disk and 3D otherwise. The power law slope also show a weak correlation with the surface density of star formation rate for these galaxies. We found for the external spiral galaxies the power spectrum is a power law up to a length scale of 10 to 16 kpc, indicating turbulence to be operational at these large length scales. We measure the scale-height of the external nearly face-on spiral galaxy NGC 1058 to be ~ 500 pc interpreting a change in the slope observed in it's power spectrum. Power spectrum of the harassed galaxy NGC 4254 is found to be affected by galaxy harassment. For 18 spiral galaxies derived from the THINGS sample we found no correlation between the power law slope and the different dynamical parameters of these galaxies. For most of the dwarf and spiral galaxies, the intensity fluctuation power spectrum is found to be a direct probe of the density fluctuation and not affected by the velocity fluctuations in ISM. We would attempt to understand these new observations in terms of physical models of the ISM in future.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.