Paper detail

Probing the role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the photoelectric heating within photodissociation regions

We observationally investigate the relation between the photoelectric heating efficiency in PDRs and the charge of PAHs, which are considered to play a key role in photoelectric heating. Using PACS onboard Herschel, we observed six PDRs spanning a wide range of FUV radiation fields (G_0=100-10^5). To measure the photoelectric heating efficiency, we obtained the intensities of the main cooling lines, i.e., the [OI]63um, 145um, and [CII]158um, as well as the FIR continuum intensity. We used Spitzer/IRS spectroscopic mapping observations to investigate the MIR PAH features in the same regions. We decomposed the MIR PAH emission into that of neutral (PAH^0) and positively ionized (PAH^+) species to derive the fraction of the positively charged PAHs, and compare it to the photoelectric heating efficiency. The heating efficiency traced by ([OI]63um+[OI]145um+[CII]158um) / TIR, ranges between 0.1% and 0.9% in different sources, and the fraction of PAH^+ relative to (PAH^0 + PAH^+) spans from 0(+11)% to 87(+/-10)%. All positions with a high PAH^+ fraction show a low heating efficiency, and all positions with a high heating efficiency have a low PAH^+ fraction, supporting the scenario in which a positive grain charge results in a decreased heating efficiency. Theoretical estimates of the photoelectric heating efficiency show a stronger dependence on the charging parameter gamma=G_0 T^{1/2}/n_e than the observed efficiency reported in this study, and the discrepancy is significant at low gamma. The photoelectric heating efficiency on PAHs, traced by ([OI]63um+[OI]145um+[CII]158um) / (PAH+[OI]63um+[OI]145um+[CII]158um), shows a much better match between the observations and the theoretical estimates. The good agreement of the photoelectric heating efficiency on PAHs with a theoretical model indicates the dominant contribution of PAHs to the photoelectric heating. (abridged for arXiv)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.