Paper detail

Probing the Peculiar Behavior of GRS 1915+105 at Near-Eddington Luminosity

To understand the nature of supercritical accretion, we systematically analyze the {\it RXTE}/PCA data of GRS 1915+105 in its quasi-steady states, by choosing data with small variability during 1999 -- 2000. We apply a multicolor disk plus a thermal Comptonization model and take into consideration accurate interstellar absorption, a reflection component, and absorption features from the disk wind self-consistently. There is a strong correlation between the inner disk temperature and the fraction of the disk component. Most of the Comptonization-dominated spectra show $T_{\rm in} \sim 1$ keV with a high electron temperature of $>10$ keV, which may correspond to the very high state in canonical black hole X-ray binaries (BHBs). By contrast, the disk-dominated spectra have $T_{\rm in} \sim 2$ keV with a low temperature ($<10$ keV) and optically thick Comptonization, and show two separate branches in the ($L$ -- $T_{\rm in}$) diagram. The lower branch clearly follows the $L \propto T_{\rm in}^4$-track. Furthermore, applying the extended disk blackbody model, we find that 9 out of 12 datasets with disk luminosity above $0.3 L_{\rm E}$ prefer a flatter temperature gradient than that in the standard disk ($p < 0.7$). We interpret that, in the lower branch, the disk extends down to the innermost stable circular orbit, and is most probably in the slim disk state. A rapidly spinning black hole can explain both the lack of the $L \propto T_{\rm in}^2$-track and a high value of spectral hardening factor ($\sim 4$) that would be required for a non-rotating black hole. The spectra in the upper branch are consistent with the picture of a truncated disk with low temperature Comptonization. This state is uniquely observed from GRS 1915+105 among BHBs, which may be present at near-Eddington luminosity.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.